All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Colonel Jessup

Joined: 12/28/1999 Posts: 11103
Likes: 1875


They want exciting matchups. Duke, Pitt, UVA


are not exciting games. Playing them once every six years is quite fine to them. VT, GT/Miami, and UNC are good games that probably having varying importance within the fan bases but are not attractive enough to have to take on Pitt, UVA, and Duke as well while foregoing a handpicked opponent every year. I wish conference matchups were important to them but, in general, they are really just looking at the Clemson-FSU, FSU-Miami, games against SEC, and the potential playoffs.
[Post edited by Colonel Jessup at 06/20/2016 12:33PM]

(In response to this post by HOO86)

Posted: 06/20/2016 at 12:33PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
David Teel doubles down on his 9 ACC games idea. -- HOO86 06/20/2016 10:57AM
  Nobody is answerring question posed. -- East Cobb Hokie 06/21/2016 11:29AM
  Is this going to be a sticking point? -- hokieone 06/21/2016 11:24AM
  I'll take 2 wild stabs -- daveinop 06/21/2016 08:49AM
  Are Clemson and FSU in favor of 9 games now? -- ren_hoek 06/21/2016 06:52AM
  Either that or Teel is on the wrong path ** -- daveinop 06/21/2016 07:43AM
  I agree on the 9 game schedule. -- Maroon Doom 06/22/2016 10:02AM
  I don't blame ESPN on this one. -- Maroon Baboon 06/20/2016 1:39PM
  Not sure that's the only issue -- VTHOKIE21020 06/20/2016 1:42PM
  They want exciting matchups. Duke, Pitt, UVA -- Colonel Jessup 06/20/2016 12:33PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307